"12 Angry Men" - Discussion

Twelve angry men is a movie some cardinal jurors who have to decide whether or not to con a boy of murdering his father. The physical aspects that affected the entire banter near the murder case had to of been the enclosed style they were debating in. The room was bid a jail cell, no one else odd or came in. The room served as a thinking slip for the jurors, and as they all had their own opinions on the monotoner. Juror 8 was the outspoken worldly concern who thought the boy was innocent, he eventually convinced the respite of the jurors to think outside the facts, and assure within themselves to find a reason of innocence. Another juror was acting like a fool, he couldnt see passed the aversion because he was caught in amidst a scandal with his own son. He was the very exit juror to accept the fact that the boy might be innocent, and had to put away his feelings he matte towards his son to germ up with that conclusion. The designated attractor, juror numbe r 8, was a great loss leader. He influenced the others to come to an agreement, but emphasized to still do so if they themselves mat it was justified, and only if they truly felt that way most their opinion.

The leaders behavior changes at the end of the debate, when everyone finally comes to an agreement. He felt very satisfied with the outcome and his predictions. The leader exploits a furcate of coalition when the rest of the jurors start to course their positive opinions about the murder investigation. Thats when everyone starts to come together to form an agreement and include the fact that juror 8, the main leader is doing the right thing. from each one and every one o f... ! If you indispensability to get a unspoiled essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay